首页> 外文OA文献 >Sustainable Value Generation Through Post-retail Initiatives : An Exploratory Study of Slow and Fast Fashion Businesses
【2h】

Sustainable Value Generation Through Post-retail Initiatives : An Exploratory Study of Slow and Fast Fashion Businesses

机译:通过零售后举措实现可持续价值创造:慢速和快时尚企业的探索性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The dialogue between slow and fast fashion has gained great prominence in recent years particularly in terms of sustainability. In the forward value chain, fast fashion companies are most often considered to be unsustainable whereas the slow fashion brands are comparatively more planet-friendly. However, the discussionon the trade-off between sustainability and “speed of fashion” (classified into slow and fast fashions) in the post-retail segment is still limited. A deeper understanding, however, would not only contribute towards conceptualizing the post-retail initiatives, but would also shed light on how these are differentially undertaken by various types of fashion businesses in terms of generating sustainable value. This study proposes sustainable value generation in terms of closing the material and responsibility loops. It further reveals that the trade-off in post-retail is not as rigid as itis in the forward value chain. However, fast fashion offers the lowest potential todisplace the purchase of new clothes to close the material loop whereas the redesign brands offer the highest; moreover fast fashion is less liable to take extended responsibilities compared to the slow fashion brands. It can be concluded that fast fashion is somewhat “stuck in the middle” in comparison to the slow and redesign brands in terms of generating value through closing the loop activities.
机译:近年来,特别是在可持续性方面,慢速和快速时尚之间的对话日益突出。在前向价值链中,快时尚公司通常被认为是不可持续的,而慢时尚品牌则相对于地球更友好。但是,关于零售后细分市场中可持续性与“时尚速度”(分为慢速和快速时尚)之间权衡取舍的讨论仍然有限。然而,更深入的理解不仅将有助于概念化零售后举措,而且还将阐明各种时尚企业如何在产生可持续价值方面以不同方式进行这些举措。这项研究从闭合物质和责任循环的角度提出了可持续的价值创造。这进一步表明,零售后的权衡并不像远期价值链中那样僵化。但是,快时尚在取代新衣服以封闭物料循环方面的潜力最低,而重新设计的品牌则具有最高的潜力。此外,与低速时尚品牌相比,快速时尚不承担更多责任。可以得出结论,与慢速品牌和重新设计的品牌相比,快时尚在某种程度上“停留在中间”,它们通过闭合循环活动来创造价值。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pal, Rudrajeet;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号